Showing posts with label post processing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label post processing. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

DXO Optics Pro

When I first bought my DSLR and started gathering a little in-depth knowledge about photography, I quickly found myself overwhelmed by lots of buzzwords. "Chromatic aberration", "vignetting", "fringing", "lens flare", "distortion", "noise" -- just to name a few. These are all things I was never even aware of in the point & shoot camera world.

Luckily, there are some good pieces of software that can help you mitigate some of these problems without having to necessarily become an expert in each one. Why am I advocating that you not become an expert in each of these topics? Take a look at a snippet of an explanation of chromatic aberration by PA van Walree:

"When different colors of light propagate at different speeds in a medium, the refractive index is wavelength dependent. This phenomenon is known as dispersion. A well- known example is the glass prism that disperses an incident beam of white light into a rainbow of colors [1]. Photographic lenses comprise various dispersive, dielectric glasses. These glasses do not refract all constituent colors of incident light at equal angles, and great efforts may be required to design an overall well-corrected lens that brings all colors together in the same focus. Chromatic aberrations are those departures from perfect imaging that are due to dispersion. Whereas the Seidel aberrations are monochromatic, i.e. they occur also with light of a single color, chromatic aberrations are only noticed with polychromatic light."
Had enough? That's just the introductory paragraph of the document. It continues on in great technical detail. If you're fascinated by the nitty gritty and the paragraph I've quoted only intrigues you more, then I'd hate to be the one to dissuade you from learning more. But my point is that you don't have to be an expert in this stuff just to take a decent photograph. For most people, chromatic aberration can be distilled down to "some parts of your photos have purple colored edges."

Chromatic aberration is just one of the many optical irregularities that DXO Optics Pro addresses. It's the software I've chosen to use, and I'm extremely happy with the results it provides. I'll try to illustrate the benefits of the software by showing you some photos before and after being processed by DXO Optics Pro, and some of the optical issues that it resolved in the images.

Let's start with lens distortion. Here's what DXO has to say about it:
"A perfect lens would render straight lines as straight, no matter where they occur. Most practical lenses aren’t that good, though, and instead bend lines outwards (barrel distortion) or inwards (pincushion distortion). Wide-angle lenses and wide-range zoom lenses often suffer particularly badly from this."
I have some good examples of lens distortion in my photo collection, as I have primarily used a wide-angle zoom lens. Disclaimer: these pictures were chosen not because they are particularly good photos, but because they most succinctly illustrate the issues being discussed.

Initially the images you see are the unaltered images that came out of my camera. By moving your mouse over the image you'll be able to see the photo after it was corrected with DXO. Sometimes without having the photos side-by-side (or in this case, overlayed each other) it's difficult to notice the subtleties, but boy do they become apparent when you can flip your mouse over them and immediately see the before/after in full effect.

NOTE: If you mouse over the images and see no change in your feed reader, you may need to click-through to the full blog post.

Here we go with some barrel distortion examples:








Take a look at the balcony before you mouse over the image below. Once you mouse over it, you should see the balcony straighten up into a horizontal line.




Now take a look at pincushion distortion.

Pay close attention to the lines on the doors and the piping to the left of the doors.







Next, there's vignetting. Here's a quick note from DXO to keep in mind as you look at the images:
"Most lenses are brighter in the center than at the edges, especially when wide open. This is especially pronounced with wide-angles and some long telephoto lenses. This phenomenon is known as light fall-off or vignetting."














Moving on to
lighting:

Sometimes DXO can turn what seems like a lost cause into a usable image.







Link: http://dxo.com/intl/photo/dxo_optics_pro

Monday, October 1, 2007

How to watermark your images, and why

UPDATE:
Here is another article from the New York Times about people's photographs from Flickr being used without permission. I'm not saying that watermarking is a silver bullet, but I do think that it's a deterrent. Props to my friend Jamie for passing this article on to me.
---------

"Why should I watermark my images?", you ask?

Dan Heller, extremely knowledgeable on the topic, has this to say:

"The net-net is there's big money in copyright violations, especially if photos are registered with the copyright office and they are watermarked. What keeps this from becoming a more prominent figure in the industry itself is two-fold: the lack of awareness of how lucrative it can be, and the "resources" available for tracking the infringements in the first place. But, like anything that has the potential for money, there will be those who start down those paths to see where they lead. For those playing the home game, keep in mind that the issues faced by agencies are not shared by individual photographers. That is, while an agency may have business risk by being too aggressive in pursuing violators, individuals certainly do not. Even as I type this, yet another email has just trickled in from another concerned photographer, "I'm going to take my images off Flickr because I don't want them stolen." My response to him will be to read this article."
You really should read the entire post, it's long but very enlightening. I'm not saying that everyone should feel the need to watermark their images, but if you hope to one day make money from your work by selling it (to clients, stock photo agencies, etc.), then it's probably in your best interest to take some precautions to protect your hard work.

Here are some watermarking options. This is obviously not an exhaustive list -- it's just something to get you poking around.

Downloadable watermarking software

Mac
PicMark
http://www.digitalcalamity.org/lib/php/index.php?DC_item=picmark&DC_section=applications
Windows
Picture Shark
http://www.picture-shark.com/
It's free!

Photoshop watermarking tutorials

Read the fine print

As you might expect, not all watermarking tutorials and software take the many factors into account. For instance, some of the tutorials only work on landscape photos of a certain size. Some are hard to use for batch processing of tens or hundreds of photos at once. It's best to find one that allows you to define some rules for how you want your watermark placed. Ideally the size/dimensions of the image shouldn't matter, and you should just be able to say "I want my watermark placed in the bottom right corner of the image, with a 20 pixel padding on the right and a 20 pixel padding on the bottom". Then you could batch process a whole directory of images with the peace of mind that your watermarking tool will just do the right thing, every time.


My Recommendation

I'm partial to this tutorial: you create an Adobe ImageReady droplet that you can just drag images onto for watermarking. A droplet is basically just an executable file that sits somewhere convenient (like your desktop, etc), and you can drag any files onto it that you want watermarked. Once you drag your photos onto the droplet, it processes your photos and creates a new copy of each one with a watermark added, and places them in a directory you have specified. I've found it very convenient to use. Of course, you need to have ImageReady installed to be able to use this, so it may not be the most convenient option for everyone.

The tutorial:
http://www.photosig.com/articles/1514/article

Here's an example that I've watermarked -- it's one of my favorite photos of my nephews.

Saturday, September 29, 2007

46 useful photoshop shortcuts, in two parts

From digital-photography-school.com:

Also, don't forget to read through the comments at the bottom of these posts for even more user-submitted tips & tricks.

Monday, September 24, 2007

photo textures from Jesh de Rox

Jesh de Rox sells a texture package that allows you to change the way your photos look by applying textures to your photos in post-processing. His home page contains a flash slideshow of before/after shots that are pretty incredible. Some of the examples go from looking like a pretty typical wedding photo to looking like a painting that I could see myself hanging on my wall.

From his site:

"you are purchasing 35 high-res Texture image files used in Jesh de Rox's award winning experiential post processing style, as well as the license to use them for personal and commercial photographs and/or art pieces."
Really cool stuff. I'm not very proficient with Photoshop myself at this point, but it does mention that the texture set comes with a short instructional video to help get you started, although they suggest taking one of their workshops to get the full experience.

http://finearttextures.com/